National Fertility Law Center
CONTACT US   |   BLOG   |   VISIT OUR WEBSITE    |  HOME   |  RSS Feed   

Surrogacy / Surrogate, Egg Donation, Embryo Donation, Sperm Donation Attorneys: Skilled, Confidential Help from National Network of Experienced Lawyers

Archive for the ‘family law’ Category

Human Egg Donor Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Complaint Filed Over Alleged Price Fixing Of Human Egg Donor Services.

Posted on: April 14th, 2011 by michelle No Comments

A class action lawsuit has been filed against American Society For Reproductive Medicine (“ASRM”), Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (“SART”) and Pacific Fertility Center (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (styled Lindsay Kamakahi v. American Society For Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Pacific Fertility Center, Civil Action Case No. 11-Cv-1781) challenging, as allegedly per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, an alleged horizontal price fixing agreement among purchasers of human egg donor services (“Donor Services”) in connection with ASRM’s alleged promulgation of certain rules setting forth the maximum compensation its members should pay for donor services (“Maximum Price Rules”), SART’s alleged adoption of such Maximum Price Rules and SART-member fertility clinics’ alleged agreement to follow such rules, according to the Human Egg Donor Services antitrust class action lawsuit complaint.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/04/13/Ova.pdf

Full Faith and Credit Given to California Parentage Order by New York Court

Posted on: October 29th, 2010 by admin No Comments

National Fertility Law Center’s Of Counsel firm, Brady Klein Weissman, won a significant ruling in a full faith and credit case last month. In D.P. v. T.R., F-04079-10, a New York State court upheld a California pre-birth order and judgment of paternity for twins conceived through gestational surrogacy.

The court ruled that the U.S. Constitution’s full faith and credit clause trumps New York’s public policy barring surrogacy. In fact, the court stated that both federal and state law hold that a state’s policy is not a valid basis to deny full faith and credit to another state’s properly adjudicated judgment.

In the case at hand, a gay couple had twins through gestational surrogacy in California, and obtained a pre-birth order of paternity in 2001. In 2010, the couple became involved in a child support proceeding where one of the men sought to escape support obligations by challenging the validity of the California parentage ruling in light of the New York state anti-surrogacy policy.  As noted by NFLC Of Counsel attorney Steven J. Weissman, “This decision gives a good deal of surety, especially to the non-biological father, that his parentage cannot later be challenged because of New York’s public policy against surrogacy.”

Same Sex Adoption in Florida

Posted on: September 22nd, 2010 by admin No Comments

Same Sex Adoption in Florida
A Miami appeals court ruled Wednesday that Florida’s ban on gays adopting is unconstitutional and affirmed the controversial adoption of two foster children by a gay North Miami couple. The unanimous 3-0 decision deals a critical blow to Florida’s 33-year-old law banning adoption by gay men and lesbians, and most likely sends the case to Florida’s highest court for resolution.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/09/22/1836756/appeal-court-florida-ban-on-gay.html#ixzz10HtHb5UL

The “State” of Affairs in Same Sex Marriage Laws

Posted on: August 5th, 2010 by admin No Comments

The “State” of Affairs in Same Sex Marriage Laws
Yesterday, a federal district court declared that Proposition 8 – which denied same sex couples the right to marriage (in California) – violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the United States Constitution. It is expected that the case will be appealed – first to a three-judge panel of the 9th Cir. Court of Appeals and then to the U.S. Supreme Court (with some additional back and forth likely in between). The district court’s ruling, however, sets the stage for a landmark decision which could make same sex marriage legal across the entire United States if the ruling is upheld.

As of today, ten countries allow same-sex couples to marry: Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain and Sweden). Lesbian and gay couples also can marry in Mexico City the most populous city in North America.

In the United States, the following six jurisdictions allow same-sex couples to marry: Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont.

The California Supreme Court held in May 2009 that the estimated 18,000 couples who married in California between that court’s marriage equality decision in May 2008 and Prop 8’s passage on November 4, 2008 remain validly married under California law. At least Maryland and New York honor married same-sex couples’ marital status from other states. At least California and New Jersey treat married same-sex couples as entitled to all state law rights and responsibilities through state domestic partnership or civil union rules.

Protect Your Parental Rights With Family Planning Documents

Posted on: July 10th, 2010 by admin No Comments

Protect Your Parental Rights With Family Planning Documents
Intended parents forming a family through surrogacy face many medical, legal, and family law issues that go beyond the basic surrogacy agreement and the initial family formation, such as:

  • Who will act as the legal guardian of your child(ren) in the event you are unable to act due to death, or temporary or permanent disability, prior to the time a parental order is obtained?
  • Who is authorized to make medical decisions with respect to your child(ren) in the event of your disability or death?
  • Who is authorized to make vital medical decisions for you if you are unable to make those decisions for yourself?
  • Who is authorized to make decisions with respect to your other legal and financial matters in the event you become temporarily or permanently disabled, including decisions relevant to the surrogacy and birth process?

Family Planning Documents are drafted to clarify your intentions as to who has authority to make these important decisions regarding your and your child(ren)’s health, medical care, and guardianship in the event of your death or incapacity.

Recognizing that our clients find themselves in multiple states both during the course of, and subsequent to, their family creation process RLC’s Family Planning Documents cover these family-medical-legal issues in a multi-jurisdictional manner drafted with the intent that they be effective in as many states as possible.

These documents include:

Guardianship Designation, Power of Attorney and Consent Signed by Your Surrogate
Your Surrogacy Agreement is an important legal document; however, its main purpose is to document your arrangement with the surrogate and the parties’ intentions. And while your parental rights are established with a court judgment, even if it is a pre-birth order it does not become effective until the birth of your child(ren). A Surrogate Guardianship Designation will help to protect your parental rights before and after the birth of your child(ren), providing you with authority to make medical and other decisions regarding your child(ren) until the court orders of parentage become effective. Therefore, we strongly recommend protecting your parental rights through this formal guardianship document; and it is ideally executed at about the same time as your surrogacy contract.

Your Formal Guardianship Designation
Many parents often consider who will be responsible for taking care of their child(ren) if they were to die or become incapacitated. Unfortunately, many parents do not find the time to ensure that this decision is made legally binding. Nomination of Guardian and Nomination of Standby Guardian documents officially name your choice of alternate/backup guardian(s) of the child(ren), while in utero and once born, in the event that you are unable to be there to care for your child(ren). These documents are accompanied by stand-alone consent forms authorizing another intended parent or a third person to consent to medical treatment for the child(ren). This group of documents is particularly important for families where only one intended parent will be listed on the birth certificate.

Advance Healthcare Directives/Proxies
Advanced healthcare directives establish your rights to have a particular person make healthcare decisions for you if you are unable to do so for yourself.

General Durable Powers of Attorney
Power of Attorney documents establish the right of your designated person to administer your assets and make legal and financial decisions on your behalf (including with respect to the surrogacy) in the event you are unable to do so for yourself.

Your Family Planning Documents can also:

  • Supplement your will or living trust and insure that appropriate legal appointments and expressions of intent are in place prior to the execution of a will or living trust (which are more complex and often require substantial time to develop in conjunction with an overall estate plan);
  • Save you time and money, since many of the Family Planning Documents would ordinarily be part of the suite of documents that you would prepare in connection with a will or living trust.

RLC’s Family Planning Documents are applicable to all Intended Parents, whether single, married, or in a domestic partnership or civil union.

For more information, please call RLC at 888-259-6000 and to speak with one of our attorneys, or email us at info@rlcsd.com.

Online Video Interview Covering Basic Legal Issues in Surrogacy

Posted on: June 16th, 2010 by admin No Comments

Surrogacy Issues for Non-U.S. Intended Parents

Click here for three 5 minute online interviews with National Fertility Law Expert, Richard Vaughn.
http://www.globalivf.com/expert-interviews.php

Family Building Options for the LGBT Community

Posted on: May 11th, 2010 by admin No Comments

Radio Interview / Q&A – Family Building Options for the LGBT Community

CreatingAFamily.org interviews Willard Halm of the National Fertility Law Center.
Will specializes exclusively in assisted reproduction and family formation law, and he and his partner are the parents of 3 children from egg donation and surrogacy.

Adoption options are also discussed, with questions in this area answered by attorney Barbara Casey.

The full radio interview may be heard by clicking on:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/creatingafamily/2010/05/05/family-building-options-for-the-lgbt-community.

If you have additional questions about family building through assisted reproduction for the LGBT community, please contact National Fertility Law Center at 1-800-558-4009 (or 1-619-464-6640 if you are dialing from outside the U.S.), and ask to speak to one of our attorneys.

Informed Consent Documents at the IVF Clinic

Posted on: February 17th, 2010 by admin No Comments

The Flood of Forms, by Deborah Forman, Of Counsel to NFLC
The full article may also be found at http://www.theafa.org/library/article/informed_consent_and_the_flood_of_forms/

If you are undergoing fertility treatment or using assisted reproductive technology to create a family, at some point, you will confront a stack of forms provided by your physician.  These forms represent one method by which your physician obtains your informed consent to proceed with treatment.  These forms likely run many pages and contain a mass of medical, legal and other information.  Some forms may require merely your initials and signature; others may require you to consider options and provide instructions regarding your treatment.  In some practices, your physician or a nurse or treatment coordinator may review these forms with you.  In others, you will be handed the packet of forms and asked to review and sign them.  Either way, the task of wading through the mountain of information and making decisions about such important matters as embryo disposition can prove daunting.  To assist you in the process, this article will explain the law of informed consent and provide an overview of the types of information and decisions you are likely to encounter in these forms.  The article concludes with tips to keep in mind before signing the forms.

Informed Consent
The legal doctrine of informed consent is designed to protect the autonomy and self-determination of each of us.  Every state recognizes that the patient has the right, in most circumstances, to determine what will happen with his or her body and whether to accept or reject proposed medical treatment.  Indeed, even the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized this right.  Moreover, a doctor’s failure to obtain the informed consent of his or her patient can subject the doctor to liability.

For many types of treatment, this process consists primarily of a discussion between the physician and patient; no written forms may be involved.  For major treatments, such as surgery, the physician typically requires the patient to sign a number of forms authorizing the procedure and outlining the risks of the proposed procedure, as a supplement to the conversations the physician has with the patient covering the proposed treatment.  The written forms are not a substitute for the patient’s conversation with her doctor, but they are an important part of the process.  While you may see the forms as a tedious obstacle that must be plowed through as fast as possible, in fact, the forms offer you an opportunity to review the information shared by your doctor at your own pace and to formulate questions that need further response.  It can be difficult in an initial discussion to absorb fully all the information provided by your physician.  In addition, it is critically important to understand that the forms can have significant legal consequences.  For that reason alone, it is essential that you read carefully and fully understand the documents before signing them.

Information Disclosed
The legal standards governing the information that must be disclosed to satisfy the requirement of informed consent vary from state to state but fall into one of two categories.  About half the states determine the adequacy of the disclosures based on what other doctors of that type would have disclosed in that situation. Other states determine the adequacy of disclosure by whether the physician has disclosed all information that would be material to a reasonable and intelligent decision by the patient.  In terms of the written consent forms, there is little difference between these two standards.  In addition, your physician’s decision about what information to disclose is likely to be influenced by guidance from professional societies, such as the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM).

The heart of the informed consent process is the explanation of the procedure and the benefits, risks and alternatives to the proposed treatment.  The forms likely will explain in considerable detail the myriad risks of the treatment, including any medications prescribed, to the patient (or donor or surrogate), as well as to any children resulting from the treatment.  Informed consent does not require your physician to disclose every conceivable risk, no matter how remote or unlikely.  Nor does he or she have to disclose risks that are commonly known, such as the risk of infection from surgery.  But risks of serious adverse outcomes should generally be disclosed.

Unlike forms used by other types of physicians, the forms used by fertility doctors often go way beyond these medical matters and contain information that does not technically fall under the doctrine of informed consent but can have significant legal consequences for you.  For example, a form covering in vitro fertilization using donor eggs may include statements regarding the intentions of the parties as to who will be considered a parent under the law.  Forms authorizing cryopreservation (freezing) of eggs, sperm or embryos will likely seek directions from you regarding future disposition of any unused embryos. In some cases, courts have considered and relied on statements in consent forms to determine parental rights in disputes over children born through assisted reproduction and to decide disputes over embryos in cases of divorce or death.

Unfortunately, clinics do not always have forms that accurately reflect the wide range of family configurations utilizing assisted reproduction, and patients risk future legal difficulties by signing forms that do not correctly identify them, their relationship to their partners and to their future children.  For example, in a California case, K.M. v. E.G. (2005), a lesbian couple initiated IVF treatment to conceive a child.  One of the partners provided the egg; the other partner carried the child to term.  When the relationship ended, the partner who had gestated the child claimed that she never intended for the partner who provided the egg to be considered a legal parent of the child, despite the genetic connection and the fact that they had raised the child together for several years.  The trial court found that the genetic mother was merely an egg donor, with no parental rights, relying in part on the consent form she signed at the time of treatment.  She claimed that she signed the form because that was the only option presented to her, and she and her partner wanted to get going with treatment.  The California Supreme Court ultimately overturned the decision, but the risk remains.  You should not sign a form that does not accurately reflect your intentions as an intended parent, donor or surrogate.

Individuals and couples participating in third party reproduction also need to be aware of potential conflicts between the physician’s consent forms and contracts they may have entered into.  Physicians’ forms cannot possibly address all the specific details and the variations covered in a surrogacy or egg donor contract.  Consequently, if the consent form appears to conflict with your egg donor, surrogacy or other contract, you should discuss the matter with your attorney.  Often the contract will contain a clause that supersedes the language of the consent form.  Without such a clause, the conflicting provision could cause problems if a dispute arises.

Tips for Navigating the Forms

The informed consent requirement aims to protect patients.  Written consent forms are an integral part of that process, especially for patients undergoing fertility treatment, but they are drafted to cover a multitude of situations and with an eye, as well, toward protecting the physician from potential liability.  To get the most out of the forms and to help you avoid future disputes, keep in mind the following key points:

  1. The consent forms can have lasting legal consequences.  All participants in the treatment should READ them thoroughly and carefully.
  2. For the same reason, do not sign forms that contain provisions that do not accurately describe your family configuration and your intention.
  3. Seek the advice of counsel if you are unsure of the meaning or effect of provisions, especially those regarding parentage or embryo disposition.  The added fee for a consultation may be well worth the expense for peace of mind and the opportunity to avoid costly legal disputes in the future.
  4. Pay close attention to any responsibilities imposed on you, such as to provide updated contact information or instructions regarding stored embryos.
  5. Finally, the written forms should be a supplement to—not a substitute for—discussion with your physician.  If you have any questions about information contained in the forms, ask your physician or other knowledgeable health care provider.

Should Surrogacy Agencies Self-Regulate?

Posted on: August 25th, 2009 by admin No Comments

In response to a number of situations involving less than scrupulous business practices by some former agencies and escrow companies in the surrogacy field, several intra-industry conversations have been taking place this past year regarding whether to self-regulate the industry. The Reproductive & Genetic Technology Committee of the Family Law Section of the American Bar Association proposed to circulate a form for comments by all – including agencies – prior to drafting any legislation in this regard.

At this time, there is no pending legislation for consideration, and the template form for collecting comments has not yet been circulated.
For updated information on the ABA Family Law Section subcommittee’s efforts in this regard, contact the ABA subcommittee.

http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=FL142000